vmware workstation 12 pro mouse acts funny

I think people tend to underestimate how small efficiency improvements add up and enable exponential values to the system as a whole.

However, if it's there, I'd totally prioritize it higher than other things you listed. Of course, that 0.005L car won't come earlier than a good electric car. No needs for huge exhaust and cooling systems, since the wasted energy is significantly reduce. The dashboard doesn't need a dedicated slot for showing the fuel gauge, more wirings and mechanical parts removed. Gas tank can be moved to a safer/closer location where it is used. The car no longer needs to have a hole on the side for filling up. That means the car can be driven for all its expected lifetime (500k km) in a single tank of gas, filled up at the time of purchase! That means there is a huge opportunity to further optimize for many things in the system: I'll prioritize the 0.005L per 100km car for sure. I'd say that at that point, other factors like comfort, performance, base price, etc. > 'how much would you prioritize a car that used only 0.05 liters per 100km over one that used 0.5? What about one that used only 0.005L?'. Hence the complexity/performance overhead of using technologies that allow software to be easily iterated and expanded are justified, to my mind (though we should be mindful of technology that claims to improve our agility but really only adds complexity). than any performance characteristics of the software they use. These days, I think most users will lose more time and be more frustrated by poor UI design, accidental inputs, etc. are also a problem, but I think they're mostly orthogonal to under-the-hood performance).

are the main differentiators (admittedly feature bloat, ads, tracking, etc. For now though, most users are happy-enough with the performance of most software, and other factors like aesthetics, ease-of-use, etc. If basic computer operations like loading a webpage took minutes rather than seconds, I think there would be more general interest in improving performance. The better question is 'how much would you prioritize a car that used only 0.05 liters per 100km over one that used 0.5? What about one that used only 0.005L?'. Would you buy a car if it eats 100 liters per 100 kilometers? How about 1000 liters?

Vmware workstation 12 pro mouse acts funny